ABSTRACT
The purpose of this prospective study is to understand the early hematological effects of chemo-radiation therapy in cancer patients, their pattern of recovery and to ascertain their prognostic value. 255 diagnosed cancer patients planned for definitive treatment with radiation therapy alone or with chemotherapy were included in this two year prospective study. A complete blood count was done at baseline, weekly during the course of therapy and thereafter, monthly for a period of 6 months. For the purpose of grading clinical toxicity, the Common Toxicity Criteria, CTCAE v2.0 was used while RECIST criteria was used to define the tumor response rates. This study was statistically analyzed using SPSS software. 255 patients were included in the study wherein head and neck cancers comprised the major patient population [28.6%] followed by cervix [18.8%] and breast [15.7%]. Out of these, 37% in head-and-neck cancer subgroup, and 58.3% in cervix had anemia at start of treatment. 92.2% cases with chemoradiation developed anemia during treatment, while with radiation alone it was 95.5%. This was statistically significant in patients with cancer uterine cervix [p < 0.01]. At the end of treatment 65% patients with normal hemoglobin had complete responses [CR], while 58.3% with mild anemia and 33.3% with moderate anemia had CR [p=0.1]. Severe anemia during treatment is a poor prognostic indicator and is usually a sign of advanced disease. Leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occur more commonly during chemoradiotherapy as against radiotherapy alone, but improves with supportive management
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Hematology , Neoplasms , Prospective Studies , AnemiaABSTRACT
Background: We investigated the physico-biochemical changes in saliva and its relation to quality of life (QOL) in head and neck cancer patients following conventional radiation therapy (RT). Materials and Methods: 53 consecutive head and neck cancer patients underwent conventional RT using telecobalt photons. We analyzed objective sialometry and sialochemical parameters of salivary gland function and a physician reported Oral Assessment Protocol to assess the patients' QOL during (baseline, 3 and 6 weeks) and post RT (3 and 6 months). Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software (version 15.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Stimulated salivary flow rates had shown a consistent decline during and in post-RT analysis (P < 0.001). A significant correlation was seen between mean salivary flow rates at 6 months post-RT and mean salivary electrolytes and amylase levels during the same period (P < 0.001). Mean global QOL scores had significantly worsened during RT and were still significantly poorer at 6 months than initial pre-RT levels (P < 0.001). Further, significant correlation was established between salivary pH values with global QOL scores at 6 months (P = 0.05). Conclusions: Radiation-induced hyposalivation invariably persists and correlates with poor global QOL scores seen during and following conventional RT. Post RT, there is a trend for biochemical reversal toward pre-irradiation levels suggesting a subsiding inflammation or a probable functional recovery.